XS
SM
MD
LG
Principal: Jason Sims
Phone:
843-849-2200
School Address:
3100 Thomas Cario Blvd Mt Pleasant, SC 29466
Serving Grades: PK-2
Student Enrollment: 691
No Data Available
*On-time graduation means graduation within four years of the initial enrollment in High School.
*SC ALT - is an alternate assessment that is developed to meet the needs of students with significant disabilities who cannot particiapte in the regular assessment even with appropriate accommodations.
NOTE: For additional information, visit the National Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) website here: https://ocrdata.ed.gov/
Phone:
843-849-2200
School Address:
3100 Thomas Cario Blvd Mt Pleasant, SC 29466
Serving Grades: PK-2
Student Enrollment: 691
2024-2025 Overall Rating
0 out of
0
School performance is not yet rated based on the criteria to ensure all students meet the Profile of the SC Graduate
Support Status:
Standard
Academic Achievement
Questions about what your child should be learning in school?NOTE: Additional Achievement results disaggregated across subgroups can be found in the Download Data section of this website as well as on the State Assessment Results pages.
Overall Student Performance
Additional Information
| Our School | Change from Last Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Prime instructional time | 91.0 | N/A |
Preparing for Success
Questions about what your child should be learning in school?This indicator displays the SC READY Science test results for elementary and middle school students and the End-of-Course Biology and U.S. History test results for high school students.
Additional Information
Kindergarten Readiness Assessment
Percentage of Students enrolling in Kindergarten and Demonstrating readiness to learn
Percentage of students Demonstrating Readiness on the KRA 74.9%
Percentage of students Approaching Readiness on the KRA 21%
Percentage of students Emerging Readiness on the KRA 4.2%
| Our School | Our District | Statewide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 74.9% | 53.5% | 38.9% |
| By Domains: (The cut score for "Overall" was used across all domains in order to provide comparative information. Does not necessarily reflect domain level readiness.) | |||
| Social Foundation | 65.9% | 58.4% | 51.1% |
| Language and Literacy | 73.1% | 49.5% | 34.9% |
| Mathematics | 74.3% | 45.9% | 34% |
| Physical Well-Being | 83.2% | 65.3% | 55.6% |
First and Second Grade Students on Track for Success in ELA and Math
| Our School | Our District | Statewide | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | N | % | N | % | N | |
| Second grade students who are on track for success in English Language Arts at the third grade. | 88.2% | 212 | 63.5% | 3859 | 53% | 56238 |
| Second grade students who are on track for success in Mathematics at the third grade. | 91% | 212 | 62% | 3859 | 51.1% | 56238 |
| First grade students who are on track for success in English Language Arts at the second grade | 87.9% | 174 | 64.7% | 3615 | 53.3% | 55790 |
| First grade students who are on track for success in Mathematics at the second grade | 86.2% | 174 | 65.1% | 3615 | 52.6% | 55790 |
Multilingual Learners' Progress
Multilingual Learners - ML
The goal is that students who are learning the English language will become proficient in English within at least five years of their initial enrollment in public schools.
Students in the ML Subgroup who Met Progress Toward Proficiency Target
District 36.5% (1823 / 4993)
State 38.2% (20461 / 53564)
Students in the ML Subgroup who Achieved English Language Level Proficiency
District 17.8% (1158 / 6520)
State 26.8% (21236 / 79099)
| Percent of Students in the ML Subgroup who Met Progress Toward Proficiency Target | Data N/A |
|---|---|
| Number of Students in the ML Subgroup who Met Progress Toward Proficiency Target | Data N/A |
| Number of Students in the ML Subgroup included in the Met Progress calculation | 10 |
| Number of Students in the ML Subgroup | 25 |
| Number of Students in the ML Subgroup who Achieved English Language Level Proficiency | Data N/A |
| Percent of Students in the ML Subgroup who Achieved English Language Level Proficiency | Data N/A |
| Number of Students taking the English language proficiency test | Data N/A |
State Goals
Federal law requires that each state report card include long-term goals and measurements of interim progress for all students and defined subgroups of students. This section reports the long-term goals and performance of all students statewide. The goals below are from our state's 2019 ESSA plan approved by the United States Department of Education. Information on subgroup performance may be found in the "Download Data" section on the main page.
| Baseline | Targets | Current Year | |||
| 2019 ESSA Plan Goals | 2017 | 2020 | 2026 | 2035 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent scoring level 2 or above - English/ELA - All Students | 74.2% | 79.5% | 82.1% | 90.0% | 82.6% |
| Percent scoring level 2 or above - Math - All Students | 75.8% | 79.5% | 82.1% | 90.0% | 72.8% |
| Percent scoring level 3 or above - English/ELA - All Students | 43.2% | 47.7% | 56.6% | 70.0% | 63.5% |
| Percent scoring level 3 or above - Math - All Students | 46.0% | 50.0% | 58.0% | 70.0% | 47.5% |
| Percent of Students Graduating On-Time* (All Students) | 82.6% | 83.8% | 86.3% | 90.0% | 86.5% |
| Percent of EL Students meeting 70% proficiency target | 31.0% | 37.4% | 50.2% | 70.0% | 38.2% |
2019 ESSA Plan Goals Defined As:
90% of Students at Level 2 or higher on following state assessments
70% of Students at Level 3 or higher on following state assessments
| Level | Elementary/Middle Schools English language arts (ELA) and Math Based on SC READY Results |
High School End-of-Course Assessment in English language arts (English 1) and Math (Algbra 1) |
SC ALT* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does Not Meet Expectations | F | Emerging |
| 2 | Approaches Expectations | D | Foundational |
| 3 | Meets Expectations | C | Increasing |
| 4 | Exceeds Expectations | B | Applied |
| 5 | A |
Student Engagement
Additional Information
| Our School | Change from Last Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Students (7th and 8th grade) enrolled in high school credit courses | N/AV | N/A |
| Percent of students served by gifted and talented program | N/AV | N/A |
| Percent of students retained | 0.4 | Down from 0.7 |
| Principal's/Superintendent's/Director's years at school/district | 2 | Up from 1 |
| Percent of classrooms with wireless access | 100 | No change |
| Percent of students served by 1:1 learning | 100 | No change |
Chronic Absenteeism Rate (Note: Data are from prior school year)
| 10.5 |
Up from 7.8 |
|
| Percent of 8th Graders with Individual Graduation Plan (IGP) | N/AV | N/A |
Results of Teacher, Student, and Parent Opinion Surveys
| Teachers | Students | Parents | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of surveys returned | 40 | Data N/A | 70 |
| Percent satisfied with learning environment |
100% |
Data N/A |
98.5% |
| Percent satisfied with social and physical environment |
97.5% |
Data N/A |
100% |
| Percent satisfied with school-home relations | 100% |
Data N/A |
93.2% |
Classroom Environment
| Our School | Change from Last Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Number of Teachers | 37 | Up from 35 |
| Percent of K-3 teachers who are certified in Read to Succeed reading certification | 60.0 | Up from 46.4 |
| Percent of teachers with advanced degrees | 62.2 | Down from 62.9 |
| Teacher attendance rate | 95.8 | Up from 95.4 |
| Average teacher salary | $73,747 | Up from $68,003 |
| Percent of teachers on continuing contract | 97.3 | Down from 100.0 |
| Percent of teachers returning from previous year - current year | 71.4 | Down from 92.9 |
| Percent of teachers returning from previous year - three year average | 83.2 | Down from 86.4 |
| Percent of teacher vacancies for more than 9 weeks | 0.0 | No change |
| Prime instructional time | 91.0 | N/A |
| Student-teacher ratio in core subjects | 27.7 to 1 | Up from 21.1 to 1 |
| Percent of inexperienced principals | 100.0 | N/A |
| Number of inexperienced principals | 1.0 | N/A |
| Percent of inexperienced other school leaders | 100.0 | N/A |
| Number of inexperienced other school leaders | 1.0 | N/A |
| Percent of inexperienced teachers | 8.1 | Down from 12.5 |
| Number of inexperienced teachers | 3 | Down from 5 |
| Percent of out-of-field teachers | 0.0 | Down from 42.5 |
| Number of out-of-field teachers | 0 | Down from 17 |
ESSA regulations require states to post on their report cards information about teachers with emergency or provisional credentials. South Carolina does not award emergency or provisional credentials, thus that metric is not listed.
Note: The method for calculating prime instructional time was adjusted for 2025 school report cards. Comparing 2025 prime instructional time to prior years is not appropriate.
Student Safety
Unsafe Incident Information as reported in the 2024-2025 Incident Management System (IMS)
| Number of Incidents | |
|---|---|
| Have there been any incidents involving a firearm? | No |
| Was a homicide committed at your school? | No |
| Incidents of rape or attempted rape | 0 |
| Incidents of sexual assault (not rape) | 0 |
| Incidents of robbery w/ weapon | 0 |
| Incidents of robbery w/ firearm or explosive | 0 |
| Incidents of robbery w/out weapon | 0 |
| Incidents of physical attack w/ weapon | 0 |
| Incidents of physical attack w/ firearm or explosive | 0 |
| Incidents of physical attack w/out weapon | 0 |
| Incidents of threats of physical attack w/ weapon | 0 |
| Incidents of threats of physical attack w/ firearm or explosive | 0 |
| Incidents of threats of physical attack w/out weapon | 2 |
| Incidents of possession of firearm or explosive | 0 |
| Students with in-school suspensions | 0 |
| Students with out of school suspensions | 3 |
| Students expelled | 0 |
| School related arrests and referrals to law enforcement | 0 |
| Incidents of bullying and harassment | 2 |
Financial Data
Note: Current detailed finance data are available on the Financial Data page of this downloadable dataset.
School level Financial Information
| Our School | Change from Prev Year | |
|---|---|---|
| Average teacher salary | $73,747 | Up from $68,003 |
| Percent of expenditures for instruction | 66.6 | Up from 56.4 |
| Percent of expenditures for teacher salaries | 58.1 | Up from 52.5 |
| Average administrator salary | $120,989 | Up from $112,477 |
| Percent of students in poverty (TANF, Medicaid, SNAP, foster child, homeless or migrant) | 18.6 | Up from 18.3 |
| Prior fiscal year State & Local Personnel Per Pupil Expenditure | $12,370 | Down from 19850 |
| Prior fiscal year Federal Personnel Per Pupil Expenditure | $4,041 | Up from 2951 |
| Prior fiscal year State & Local Non-Personnel Per Pupil Expenditure | $2,921 | Down from 5749 |
| Prior fiscal year Federal Non-Personnel Per Pupil Expenditure | $1,268 | Down from 1858 |
| Prior fiscal year Total State & Local Per Pupil Expenditure | $15,292 | Down from 25599 |
| Prior fiscal year Total Federal Per Pupil Expenditure | $5,310 | Up from 4810 |
| Prior fiscal year Total Per Pupil Expenditure | $20,601 | Down from 30409 |